Aros2k
Member Since: 22 Jun 2023, 09:31
Last Activity: 30 Nov 2023, 19:03
Account Type: [Registered]
Softcore Points: 48,963
Softcore Achievements: 6,484
Softcore Rank: #60 / 58,521 ranked users
Forum Post History
Requested Sets - 5 of 12 Requests Made
Last seen in 
Crash Bandicoot 3: Warped (PlayStation)
Crash Bandicoot 3: Warped (PlayStation) Crash is in Level 13: High Time | 🧡: 47 | 💎: 8/45
Last 5 games played
PS1
PS1
PS1
GBC
GB
User Wall
I think part of the issue is outside of achievements, with the focus on badges - I can't spoil too much about it, but there is something new coming up that will reward players for getting achievements even without doing all of the challenge achievements ;)
And glad to hear the SG-1000 games caught your eye! There's an event going on with those, so there will be a large batch of new SG-1000 sets in the near future :D
The large number of revisions at the moment is mostly for adding non-challenge achievements - the ones that you should get for playing the game normally - in order to work with that upcoming feature ;)
Revisions do not count towards all but two of the DevQuests, and those two are for fixing achievement sets (such as only having challenge achievements, or lacking save protection) - and for those, there is no primary developer requirement either. I've seen some revisions with 0 achievements added or 5 our of 60 achievements added count towards those DevQuests.
I don't have a good estimate for when it will happen or what it will look like, but the progression rewards for beating games will be coming sooner than you might think! That's why there are so many revisions at the moment, we're all trying to make sure that every set on the site rewards players for beating the game normally :D
Also, for revisions in general - you may already know this, but unless the developer revising it is the one who originally made the achievement set, it has to pass a community vote on Discord. There are often discussions there (and in the forum thread for the game) for every revision that is proposed, where players will give their feedback on whether a revision is a good idea, or a bad idea, and most developers are happy to take feedback and suggestions before they start coding the revision.